Bob,
My personal belief is that the
1860 Peter is the same as the 1870 Peter. Ages aren’t really accurate. In 1870,
their oldest son William would have been born before the marriage. While that’s
no too shocking. I’m betting the person giving the ages was
guessing.
I have the censuses from 1900 to
1930. They are not indexed so I’ll have to do a page by page search. I’ll let
you know when I get it done.
Ken
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:50
PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Brown County (1860 Census
Index)
HI
KEN
Thanks
for the information.We have no problem in having the birth certificate posted on
the web site. When I'm finished the search I would be glad to post the family
history on your web site.
I was
surprised to see the 1860 census have a Peter Moran at age 25. Ten years later
he would be 35. I know the age of Peter Moran in the 1870 census was wrong. In
the 1880 census he was listed as age 49 making his age 39 in the 1870 census. I
realize ages are suspect. So at this point I am not sure the Peter Moran
in the 1860 census is the same Peter Moran in the 1870 and 1880 census. Not sure
if marriage certificates back then carried the date of birth. I also found
a listing of a John A Moran in the 1870 census in Brown County. There is an
interesting coincidence in that Peter Moran had a son in the 1880 census
named John A. Moran.
We found
that one of the sons of Peter, James W. Moran (my wife's grandfather) was
married in Milwaukee Wicconsin in 1897. The real brickwall we hit was after the
1880 census. Since the 1890 census was significantly destroyed in a fire we
can not determine if Peter E. Moran and his family were still in Brown County or
left the area. Is there any other local records that could fill in the blank
between 1880 and 1890??
Regards
Bob
Calabro